|
Re: Norwescon & Album Sales
Re: Norwescon & Album Sales
From: John C. Bunnell <JCBunnell at sff.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 1998 00:31:00 -0800
If the Dealers' Liaison wants to be truly and genuinely consistent, then several other common forms of con-commerce also need to be outlawed:
# the art show and art auction
(either at autograph tables, panels, or out of rooms)
of the SF/F authors who do this donate the proceeds
to charity, but principle is principle)
I will bet you that one or two of these *have* been outlawed, but no sane
concom is likely to want to (or be able to) stamp out all of the above.
This is, in a word, anal-retentive. (Frankly, I would pitch the art
show/auction as the strongest parallel--artists are allowed a dedicated
space to exhibit *and sell* their work; musicians should be entitled to the
same consideration. To allow one and disallow the other is discrimination
based on one's chosen medium of creative expression. Granted, art shows do
charge for panel space--but on the flip side of that, we don't charge
authors
I am somewhat amused by the "reserved filk table" compromise. There are a couple of easy ways to gerrymander this one--for next year's con, the filk coordinator need only persuade the concom that a modest budget increase is required for filk programming, and then take the cost of the filk table out of that budget. (If one wants to be subtle, one can undoubtedly arrange for a Front Person to launder the funds so that it looks as if the table is being paid for from outside the con.) Then, come next year's Norwescon, one simply rigs up a Nifty Sign for the Filk Table which says something to the effect of "Staff Is Out Entertaining The Masses; Buy Albums At Upstairs Annex During Concerts"--and don't worry about manning the main table. This will, of course, infuriate the dealers even more, because the concom has deprived some other worthy entrepreneur of the chance to separate wealthy fans from their hard-earned coin. But in granting even that much compromise, it seems to me that the concom is essentially recognizing that the musicians *do* have the right to sell albums--and if they are going to do so at all, they might as well give in all the way. Mind you, I do sort of see where the Dealers' Liaison is coming from. If I were going to write an overall convention policy about what's permissible in that line, it might say something to the effect that no goods or services are to be sold outside the Dealers' Room EXCEPT for those that fall under one of two categories:
There might be wrinkles to iron out in that, notably since not all cons are run by nonprofit groups, but it would be a sane start at a workable policy.
"You'll never grow old, and you'll never grow poor, If you look to the rainbow beyond the next moor."
--F. McLonergan
-----Original Message-----
<long message snipped> Received on 03/22/98 This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0. |